Analysis of methods for modeling hydrogeological systems

The exploitation of mineral deposits requires their rational use. In order to avoid deterioration of water quality and disruption of hydrodynamic processes of deposits, a unified system of monitoring and management of the process of extraction of natural resources is necessary. In this regard, the task is to develop an automated control system that can analyze the changes taking place and make adjustments to the production parameters. However, modern methods of modeling hydrogeological objects have a number of disadvantages and require serious analysis to obtain reliable modeling results. In the course of the study, the methods of modeling hydrogeological systems implemented at the Kavminvod deposits were considered. The main direction of development was obtained by methods using filtration modeling. Such equations describing the processes of geofiltration as two-dimensional and three-dimensional are considered. The results of the study represent the design and physical parameters of the considered models implemented on hydrogeological objects of the CMS region. The models have an acceptable error determined on the basis of comparing the values of the model experiment with the data obtained on real objects, and therefore it is concluded that they are effective in solving this class of problems. To increase the reliability of the results, it is necessary to take into account the number of layers, their composition, structure and integrity, in addition, to include parameters that take into account their mutual influence.

1. Hoefler T. A practical approach to the rating of barrier algorithms using the LogP model and Open-MPI. Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops. 2005;562–569.

2. Bochever F.M. Fundamentals of hydrological calculations. Nedra; 1965. 307 p. (In Russ)

3. Methods of classical and modern theory of automatic control: Textbook in 3 volumes: Methods of modern theory of automatic control. Bauman Moscow State Technical University; 2000.748 p. (In Russ)

4. Malkov A.V. Systems with distributed parameters. Analysis and synthesis. Scientific World. 2012;474. (In Russ)

5. Martirosyan A.V. Modeling of a control system with distributed parameters in relation to hydromineral resources of Caucasian mineral waters. University Science – to the region: materials of the 3rd annual scientific and practical conference of teachers, students and young scientists of NCFU. Pyatigorsk: NCFU. 2015;172. (In Russ)

6. Begimov I. Structural representation of physically inhomogeneous systems. Automation and telemechanics. 1981;9:25–35. (In Russ)

7. Koval V.A. Spectralem ratio analysis et synthesis distribuit imperium ratio. SSTU; 1997. 192 p. (In Russ)

8. Ryazanova V.V. Synthesis of the control system of the hydrolithospheric process. System synthesis and applied synergetics: proceedings of the international scientific conference. 2009;415–422. (In Russ)

9. Atroschenko O. I. Synthesis of the flow rate control system of mineral water intake wells. IGEU Bulletin. 2008;3:1-5. (In Russ)

10. Pershin I. M. Automation of production and management in the processing industry of the agro-industrial complex. Materials of the All-Union Scientific and Technical Conference (3-7 Apr., 1989). 1989;80–82. (In Russ)