Keywords: sustainable development of the region, modeling, management decisions, measurable indicators, formalized assessment, mathematical models, software
Formalized assessment and decision support models for regional development management based on measurable indicators
UDC 65.012.123; 303.725
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2023.43.4.001
The complex crisis situation in the world poses a challenge to the scientific community as to how accurately measure and forecast energy needs, environmental, social and economic factors. This requires the design of an interdisciplinary decision support model that comprehensively reflects the opportunities, local and global needs of regional development as well as the interrelation of decisions made in the region, socio-economic and environmental processes. The paper presents models that use measurable indicators and methods of system and energy analysis related to the consumption, transformation and distribution of energy resources in the production activities of regional organizational systems. Formalized concepts related to the management of regional system development, measurable indicators of environmental, socio and economic state of the regional system are presented. Capabilities of using the research results are given in the form of mathematical and software information system of decision support on the basis of measurable indicators. The results of the study confirm the applicability of the model of formalized assessment and decision support on the basis of measurable indicators as one of the alternatives under the conditions of non-monetary evaluations when making decisions with consideration to environmental, social, economic factors. The results of the study are of practical value when solving the problems of decision assessment.
1. Balaganesh G., Ravinder Malhotra, R. Sendhil, Smita Sirohi, Sanjit Maiti, K. Ponnusamy, Adesh Kumar Sharma. Development of composite vulnerability index and district level mapping of climate change induced drought in Tamil Nadu. Ecological Indicators. 2020;113. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1470160X20301345 (accessed on 22.06.23).
2. Galal Uddin Md., Nash S., Olbert A.I. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality. Ecological Indicators. 2021;122. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20311572 (accessed on 22.06.23).
3. DuBose T.P., Himes Boor G.K., Fields M., Kalies E.L., Castillo A., Moskwik M.P., Marcus J.F., Walters J.R. Remotely sensed habitat quality index reliably predicts an umbrella species presence but not demographic performance: A case study with open pine forests and red-cockaded woodpeckers. Ecological Indicators. 2023;154. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23006222 (accessed on 22.06.23).
4. Alferova T.V. Sustainable development of the region: approaches to selecting evaluation indicators. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. «Ekonomika» = Perm University Herald. ECONOMY. 2021;15(4):494–511. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-4-494-511. (In Russ.).
5. Valitova L.A., Sheresheva M.Yu. Dynamic aspect in territory sustainable development management: the case of the volga macroregion. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(3):18–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-3-2. (In Russ.).
6. Grinchel B.M., Nazarova E.A. Analysis and management of sustainable development of regions by quality of life factor. Drukerovskij vestnik. 2020;3:209–223. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2020-3-209-223. (In Russ.).
7. Zhilina N.N., Ignatev V.G. Sustainable development of the region and green economy. Ekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, resheniya = Economics and management: problems, solutions. 2021;5(11(119)):99–102. (In Russ.).
8. Zakharova E.N., Bakhova Ya.S. Sustainable development of the territory: theoretical foundations and strategic approach to implementation. Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra = Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. 2020;10(6A):53–63. DOI: 10.34670/AR.2020.73.94.007. (In Russ.).
9. Kovalskaya A.E., Olejnikova I.N. Assessment of indicators of sustainable development of a monone-resource region (on the example of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District). Konkurentosposobnost v globalnom mire: ekonomika, nauka, texnologii = Competitiveness in the Global World: Economics, Science, Technology. 2022;2:42–46. (In Russ.).
10. Korshunov I.V. Sustainable development in regional strategies: approaches and solutions. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of regions. 2023;19(1):15–28. (In Russ.).
11. Minakov A.V., Eriashvili N.D. Theoretical aspects of sustainable development of Russian regions. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry = Education. The science. Scientific personnel. 2022;4:203–210. (In Russ.).
12. Morozova N.V., Vasileva I.A., Danilov I.P., Ivaniczkaya I.P. Theory and methodology of sustainable development for the Chuvash Republic in the midterm under the conditions of major challenges and social, ecological and economic limitations. Cheboksary, Sreda Publishing House; 2020. 284 p. (In Russ.).
13. Serga L.K., Grishakova A.A. On the evaluation of the region's sustainable development. Ekonomika Vostoka Rossii = Economics of Russian East. 2022;14(1):13–21. (In Russ.).
14. Stepanov V.S., Bobkov V.N., Shamaeva E.F., Odintsova E.V. Building a model linking the indicator of the standard of living of the population with a set of indicators of socio-economic policy in the regions of russia. Uroven` zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Living Standards of the Population in the Regions of Russia. 2022;18(4):450–465. (In Russ.).
15. Tagirov K.T. Problems of ensuring sustainable socio-economic development of the region (on the example of the Republic of Dagestan). Ekonomika i predprinimatelstvo = Journal of Economy and entrepreneurship. 2022;144(7):290–293. (In Russ.).
16. Timofeev R.A., Yachmenev E.F., Timaev R.A. Components of sustainable development of regional socio-economic systems. Nauchnyj vestnik: Finansy, banki, investicii = Scientific Bulletin: Finance, banks, investments. 2020;2:221–237. DOI: 10/37279/2312-5330-2020-2-232-237. (In Russ.).
17. Shimanovskij D.V., Tret`yakova E.A. Modeling social ecological economic relations as an assessment method for sustainable development of regions in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. ECONOMY. 2020;15(3):369–384. DOI: 10.17072/1994-9960-2020-3-369-384. (In Russ.).
18. Gosavi V., Mukherjee S., Joshi R., Verma R.K., Kumar K., Pitamber P.D. Sustainable development of the Indian Himalayan Region. Current Science. 2016;111(6):967–969. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24908492 (accessed on 20.02.2023).
19. Kern K. Governance for sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies. Special Issue: Transnational Governance and Policy-Making in the Baltic Sea Region. 2011;42(1):21–35. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43213001 (accessed on 20.02.2023).
20. Ozkan U.R., Schott S. Sustainable development and capabilities for the Polar Region. Social Indicators Research. 2013;114(3):1259–1283. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24720307 (accessed on 20.02.2023).
21. Shaikin D.N., Omirzhan S.M. The role of the AIC in the sustainable regional development: economic assessment. Problems of AgriMarket. 2023;1:57–63.
22. Golovin A.A. Modeling development of complex systems using power parameters and social time budget. Ustojchivoe innovacionnoe razvitie: proektirovanie i upravlenie = Sustainable innovative development: design and management. 2020;16(2(47)):21–34. (In Russ.).
23. Knaub R.V., Dutova E.M., Ignatieva A.V. Assessment of energy-ecological capacity of a territory under the action of disasters of different genesis (on the example of the Siberian Federal District). Geosfernye issledovaniya = Geosphere research. 2023;1:88–105. (In Russ.).
24. Shamaeva E.F. Formalizing the problems of monitoring and assessment of innovations in regional sustainable innovation-driven development. Candidate of Science Thesis. Dubna International University of Nature, Society and Humankind. Dubna, 2012; 148 p. (In Russ.).
25. Kurganov M.A. A mechanism for managing regional sustainable development based on value-driven approach. Vestnik PNIPU. Socialno-ekonomicheskie nauki = Socio-economic sciences. 2021;1:194–208. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9354/2021.1.15. (In Russ.).
26. Abramov V.I., Abramov I.V., Putilov A.V., Trushinya I. Priorities for ensuring the sustainable development of the eaeu countries. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya = Journal of international economic affairs. 2023;13(1):135–158. (In Russ.).
27. Stiglitz J.E. Mismeasuring our lives: why GDP doesn't add up. Kushnareva I., translator. Moscow, Gaidar Institute Publishing House. 2016. 210 р. (In Russ.).
28. Golovin A.A. Comparative analysis of the quality of life development for population of the macroregions of Russia. Geopolitika i ekogeodinamika regionov. 2022;8(1):92–107. (In Russ.).
29. Shamaeva E.F., Golovin A.A., Perevozchikova A.K., Popov E.B., Golubkov A.V., Shadrov K.N., Batkaeva I.I., Reshetnikova V.S. Situation center for modeling sustainable social, economic and spatial development. Energy and ecology indicators. Certificate of registration of a database No. 2023620545, 13.02.2023. Application No. 2023620216, dated 03.02.2023. (In Russ.).
Keywords: sustainable development of the region, modeling, management decisions, measurable indicators, formalized assessment, mathematical models, software
For citation: Shamaeva E.F. Formalized assessment and decision support models for regional development management based on measurable indicators. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2023;11(4). URL: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1436 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2023.43.4.001 (In Russ).
Received 28.08.2023
Revised 13.09.2023
Accepted 03.10.2023
Published 31.12.2023