Keywords: information system, software robot, generalized structure, classification of software robots, operational consultant, smart assistant, decision making
Generalized internal structure of a smart assistant (a software robot) for operational support of decision making in the organization
UDC 004.896:004.584
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2024.47.4.002
The article discusses the features of using a software robot to support decision-making in an organization under uncertainty. It is noted that one of the technologies that can significantly improve the efficiency of user interaction with digital devices is smart assistants. It is proposed to consider the concept of a "smart assistant" as a software robot capable of analyzing data, identifying patterns and providing recommendations to the user on decision-making. Promising areas of application of a smart assistant are proposed depending on their functional features and possible communication channels with the user. A list of possible options for synchronizing a smart assistant with corporate information systems is considered. Models that allow a smart assistant to provide decision support functionality are considered. A comparative analysis of two options for organizing a decision support module is carried out and practical recommendations are proposed for using a combined option that involves the use of various approaches to ensure highly efficient operation of a smart assistant. A generalized internal structure of a smart assistant in a graphical format and a variant of classifying software robots according to various criteria are proposed. The proposed version of a smart assistant allows achieving high accuracy and reliability of recommendations while maintaining the speed of the software robot's response to user requests and can be used to create specialized decision support systems adapted to the specific needs of an organization.
1. Sidorov A.V. Robotization of business processes as a tool to improve the performance of work of the company employees. Khronoekonomika = HronoEconomics. 2019;(4):64–68. (In Russ.).
2. Smolentseva T.E., Akatiev Ya.A. The concept of using smart assistants in the management of an organization on the example of the Institute of Information Technologies of RTU MIREA. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma "Nadezhnost' i kachestvo" = Transactions of the International Symposium on Reliability and Quality. 2023;1:344–347. (In Russ.).
3. Ayyagari R., Grover V., Purvis R. Technostress: Technological Antecedents and Implications. MIS Quarterly. 2011;35(4):831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
4. Guerreiro J., Loureiro S.M.C. I am attracted to my Cool Smart Assistant! Analyzing Attachment-Aversion in AI-Human Relationships. Journal of Business Research. 2023;161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113863
5. Gurlev I.V. Digitalization of the Russian economy and problems of robotics. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki. 2020;12(4). (In Russ.). URL: https://esj.today/PDF/08ECVN420.pdf
6. Lobacheva A.S., Sobol O.V. Ethics of the application of artificial intelligence in human resource management. E-Management. 2021;4(1):20–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2021-4-1-20-28
7. Shermukhamedov B.A. Sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta v bankovskoi sfere. In: Rossiya: tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya: Ezhegodnik, 04–05 June 2021, Kursk, Russia. Moscow: Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences (INION) of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2021. pp. 523–525. (In Russ.).
8. Shvetsov A.N. The latest information technologies of "digitalization of the economy": content, prospects, costs. Trudy Instituta sistemnogo analiza Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Proceedings of the Institute for Systems Analysis Russian Academy of Sciences. 2021;71(2):27–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14357/20790279210204
9. Antoniadi K.S., Koval O.I., Solomko D.S. Robotics as a way to improve the efficiency of business processes. Colloquium-Journal. 2020;(4-2):68–69. (In Russ.).
10. Malodia S., Islam N., Kaur P., Dhir A. Why Do People Use Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Enabled Voice Assistants? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2021;71:491–505. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3117884
11. Marikyan D., Papagiannidis S., Alamanos E. "Smart Home Sweet Smart Home": An Examination of Smart Home Acceptance. International Journal of E-Business Research. 2021;17(2). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEBR.2021040101
12. Lau J., Zimmerman B., Schaub F. Alexa, Are You Listening?: Privacy Perceptions, Concerns and Privacy-seeking Behaviors with Smart Speakers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 2018;2(CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274371
13. Raff S., Rose S., Huynh T. Perceived creepiness in response to smart home assistants: A multi-method study. International Journal of Information Management. 2024;74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102720
Keywords: information system, software robot, generalized structure, classification of software robots, operational consultant, smart assistant, decision making
For citation: Kalach A.V., Smolentseva T.E., Akatiev Y.A. Generalized internal structure of a smart assistant (a software robot) for operational support of decision making in the organization. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2024;12(4). URL: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1615 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2024.47.4.002 (In Russ).
Received 24.08.2024
Revised 15.09.2024
Accepted 04.10.2024