Keywords: online learning, training process management, complex open ended assignment, information gathering method, error bank
A METHOD AND A TOOL FOR INFORMATION GATHERING IN ONLINE TRAINING PROCESS MANAGEMENT BASED ON AUTOMATED COMPLEX OPEN ENDED ASSIGNMENTS SCORING WITH THE USE OF ERROR BANK
UDC 005.9
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2019.27.4.034
It is possible to monitor training process using different statistic reports in learning management systems and massive open online course platforms. Online training process can be managed effectively by means of analytics applications. Analytics is based on gathered information. Problems can occur during information gathering if an online course contains complex open ended assignments, assignments which can’t be checked using tests. There are methods among the existing methods which allow to gather information effectively: situational assignment and special methods for specific domain. The methods allow to get reliable and complete information for management purposes. But the methods are not universal. Their usage is limited to open ended assignment type and domain. There is a need to develop a method for every specific task if situational assignment can’t be used and there is no special method. A universal information gathering method based on automated complex open ended assignments scoring with the use of error bank is suggested in the paper. A tool was developed and implemented in training process in Ufa state aviation technical university from 2013 till 2019. The usage of the method and the tool allowed to increase information gathering effectiveness in online training process management in complex open ended assignments implementation.
1. E-learning trends 2019. Docebo. 2018. Available from: www.docebo.com/resource/reportelearning-trends-2019 (Accessed 5th October 2019).
2. Ruiz J.S., Diaz H.J., Ruipérez-Valiente J.A., Muñoz-Merino P.J., Kloos K.D. Towards the Development of a Learning Analytics extension in Open edX. Second International Conference on TEEM, Salamanca. 2014. Available from: eprints.networks.imdea.org/974/1/TEEM_2014_EDX_cameraReady.pdf (Accessed 5th October 2019).
3. Latypova V.A. Сomplex open ended assignments in blended and online automated training. Engineering journal of Don. 2015;(3). Available from: ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n3y2015/3211 (Accessed 5th October 2019).
4. Latypova V.A. A concept of online automated training process management in implementing complex open ended assignments based on the use of error bank. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2019;7(3). Available from: moit.vivt.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2019/09/Latypova_3_19_1.pdf (Accessed 5th October 2019).
5. Latypova V.A. Information receiving in online training process management based on complex open ended assignments scoring. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2019;7(3). Available from: moit.vivt.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2019/09/Latypova_3_19_2.pdf (Accessed 5th October 2019).
6. Latypova V.A. Metodika i instrumental'noe sredstvo avtomatizirovannoy proverki rabot so slozhnym rezul'tatom na osnove ispol'zovaniya banka oshibok. Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya. 2015;49(7):41-47.
7. Stepanova N.A. Klassifikatsiya oshibok, dopuskaemykh pri proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel'naya praktika. 2016;35(1):23-30.
8. Batin P.S., Dubrovskiy A.V., Runkovskaya G.A. Klassifikatsiya vidov reestrovykh oshibok i prichin ikh nizkogo vyyavleniya. Interekspo Geo-Sibir'. 2017;(2):82-86.
9. Gu Ts., Khuan Ch. Sistema klassifikatsii perevodcheskikh oshibok. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 2016;(3):26-40.
10. Maykova N.S. Vidy oshibok uchashchikhsya pri obuchenii resheniyu geometricheskikh zadach, ikh prichiny i sposoby preduprezhdeniya. Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena. 2008;73(2):113-118.
11. Guo P. MOOC and SPOC, Which One is Better? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education. 2017;13(8):5961-5967.
12. Lin L. MOOCs and SPOCs: Evolution and inheritance of online education. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Education, Management, Computer and Society (EMCS 2016). Atlantis Press, 2016;:117-119. Available from: download.atlantispress.com/article/25848565.pdf (Accessed 5th October 2019).
13. Yakushin A.V., Gladkikh I.Yu. Vybor sistemy avtomatizirovannogo testirovaniya resheniy zadach po programmirovaniyu. International Journal of Open Information Technologies. 2016;4(6):38-43.
14. Minkin I. V. Sistema avtomaticheskoy proverki laboratornykh rabot po programmirovaniyu. Molodezh' i nauka: Sbornik materialov VI Vserossiyskoy nauchnotekhnicheskoy konferentsii studentov, aspirantov i molodykh uchenykh. Krasnoyarsk: Sibirskiy federal'nyy un-t, 2011. Available from: conf.sfukras.ru/sites/mn2010/section6.html (Accessed 5th October 2019).
15. Petukhova A.V. Ispol'zovanie utility "Normokontrol'" dlya avtomatizatsii proverki chertezhey. Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Problemy kachestva graficheskoy podgotovki studentov v tekhnicheskom vuze v usloviyakh FGOS VPO». Perm': Izdatel'stvo PGTU, 2011;:197-199.
16. Proverka chertezhey na sootvetstvie standartam. AutodeskKnowledgeNetwork. 2019. Available from: knowledge.autodesk.com/ru/support/autocad/learnexplore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2020/RUS/AutoCAD-Core/files/GUID-F8B47FBB1276-4D74-BA89-0440CB4E4866-htm.html (Accessed 5th October 2019).
17. ForeUI. Available from: www.foreui.com (Accessed 5th October 2019).
18. GPSS World. Available from: www.minutemansoftware.com (Accessed 5th October 2019).
Keywords: online learning, training process management, complex open ended assignment, information gathering method, error bank
For citation: Latypova V.A., Martynov V.V. A METHOD AND A TOOL FOR INFORMATION GATHERING IN ONLINE TRAINING PROCESS MANAGEMENT BASED ON AUTOMATED COMPLEX OPEN ENDED ASSIGNMENTS SCORING WITH THE USE OF ERROR BANK. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2019;7(4). URL: https://moit.vivt.ru/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/LatipovaMartinov_4_19_1.pdf DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2019.27.4.034 (In Russ).
Published 31.12.2019