Increasing the effectiveness of the application of protection measures against the use of duplicate RFID-tags in foreign trade

This article contains recommendations for customs bodies to combat the use of RFID-duplicates by importers in order to understate customs payments. The aim of the research is to identify recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the application of protection measures against the use of RFID-duplicates in foreign trade. Results. Analysis of existing approaches to protection against RFID-duplicates shows that the most expedient measure is the detection of duplicates based on checking information about tag readings. In this regard, recommendations for the development of a model for the application of RFID technology in foreign economic activity are proposed. But in order to establish what false information was recorded on the RFID duplicate, the customs authorities need to take control measures. Using the theory of games, it was proved that not in all cases it would be advisable to carry out control measures, and it is more profitable for customs authorities to refuse to customs clearance according to the norms of Chapter 18 of the Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union without carrying out them. To substantiate decisions on the conduct of control measures in the work, factors were identified that should be taken into account when making such decisions. Practical significance: the results obtained can be used by customs authorities during customs control in relation to imported goods marked with RFID tags, as well as by government authorities when designing a system for protecting information stored on tags issued by Goznak that are used in foreign trade.

1. Lehtonen M., Ostojic D., Ilic A., Michahelles F. Securing RFID Systems by Detecting Tag Cloning. 2009;5538:291-308.

2. Enivatova V. А. Digital labeling of alcoholic beverages. Forum molodyh uchenyh. 2019;3(31):353-355. (In Russ.)

3. Afonin D. N., Sokolova D. S. The use of radio frequency identification technology (RFIDsystem) in the fight against counterfeiting and counterfeiting of drugs. Bulletin of the International Scientific Surgical Association. 2019; 8.1:12-16. (In Russ.)

4. Lavrinovich А.А. Risks of automation of the state RFID-marking system from the position of information security in the customs authorities of the Russian Federation. Tamozhennye chteniya – 2019. Nauka i obrazovanie v usloviyah stanovleniya innovacionnoj ekonomiki: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. V 4-h tt. Vol I. StP.: RIO SPb filiala RTA, 2019;1:48-53. (In Russ.)

5. Kamaludin H., Mahdin H., Abawajy J.H. Clone tag detection in distributed RFID systems. PLoS ONE. 2018;13 (3).

6. Zanetti D., Capkun S., Juels A. Tailing RFID Tags for Clone Detection. NDSS. 2013.

7. Akula К. А. RFID tag cloning attack. Sbornik rabot 74-j nauchnoj konferencii studentov i aspirantov Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta: v 3 chastyah. Minsk: Belorusskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 2017;178-182. (In Russ.)

8. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 11.08.2016 № 787 «O realizacii pilotnogo proekta po vvedeniyu markirovki tovarov kontrol'nymi (identifikacionnymi) znakami po tovarnoj pozicii «Predmety odezhdy, prinadlezhnosti k odezhde i prochie izdeliya, iz natural'nogo mekha» i priznanii utrativshim silu postanovleniya Pravitel'stva Rossijskoj Federacii ot 24marta 2016g. N235». Available from:http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_L AW_203253/ (Accessed 05.11.2020.

9. Lavrinovich А. А. Features of RFID-marking as a means of identification for footwear. Aktual'nye problemy infotelekommunikacij v nauke i obrazovanii. VIII Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya i nauchno-metodicheskaya konferenciya; sb. nauch. st. v 4 t. 2019:403-407. (In Russ.)

10. Reshenie Soveta Evrazijskoj ekonomicheskoj komissii ot 16.07.2012 № 54 «Ob utverzhdenii edinoj Tovarnoj nomenklatury vneshneekonomicheskoj deyatel'nosti Evrazijskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza i Edinogo tamozhennogo tarifa Evrazijskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza». Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_133133/ (Accessed 05.11.2020).

11. Fadeeva Т. P., Agaeva E. V. On the question of marking fur products with a control identification mark. Problemy sovremennoj ekonomiki. Sbornik materialov HKHXVII Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. Novosibirsk: OOO «Centr razvitiya nauchnogo sotrudnichestva».2017:100-105. (In Russ.)

12. Таможенный кодекс Евразийского экономического союза. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_215315/ (Accessed 05.11.2020).

13. Danilova О. Т., Savchenko S. О., Kapchuk N. V. Algorithm for constructing a model of an intruder on the example of a physical protection system using game theory and graph theory. Scientific publishing office of OMSTU. 2017; 4 (154):115-119. (In Russ.)

14. Otchet ob ispolnenii osnovnyh pokazatelej raboty tamozhennyh organov Rossijskoj Federacii (Za IV kvartal 2019 goda). Available from: http://customs.gov.ru/activity/results/svedeniya-o-vypolnenii-osnovnyx-pokazatelejraboty-/2019-god/document/227822 (Accessed 5th November 2020).

15. Tamozhennaya sluzhba Rossijskoj Federacii v 2019 godu. Available from: http://customs.gov.ru/activity/results/ezhegodnyj-sbornik-tamozhennaya-sluzhbarossijskoj-federaczii/document/230797 (Accessed 5th November 2020).