Performance evaluation of routing protocols in VANET for example simulation Volgograd Street

Changing over digital age is becoming the driving force for modern approaches to provide a safe road system. In this regard, the VANET are destined to succeed. The paper looks at automated coordination of traffic situations. It draws our attention to diagnostic components merged into the entity by means of modern wireless communication technologies. Attempts are made to switch to the up-to-date level of transport system work. Drivers can benefit from automatic alert capabilities in developing the competent strategy to deal with the out-of-the box situations. It is spoken in detail about particular things VANET networks abound in. It should be stressed the high traffic makes it difficult to create simulation network topology. Therefore, one of the main research objectives is to determine the appropriate routing protocol for VANETs in order to have a safe traffic environment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of the routing protocols, that responsible for data transmission between nodes and their impact on the performance of VANETs. The performance was experimentally tested using a number of routing protocols with the Sumo urban mobility simulator and network simulator NS3 that simulate the environment and produce near-real results to reduce high evaluation costs. To compare the functionality of traditional protocols, performance measures were used - Mac Phy Overhead, Good put, Receive Rate, and Packets Received.

1. Houssaini Z.S., Zaimi I., Oumsis M., Ouatik S.E.A. Comparative study of routing protocols performance for vehicular Ad-hoc networks. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2017;12(13):3867–78.

2. Ahmed M.B., Boudhir A.A., Bouhorma M., Ahmed K.B. Performance Study of Various Routing Protocols in VANET Case of Study. Int J Futur Gener Commun Netw. 2014;7(6):231–40.

3. Tang L., Liu Q. A Survey on Distance Vector Routing Protocols. 2011. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1514

4. Venkatesan T.P., Rajakumar P., Pitchaikkannu A. Overview of proactive routing protocols in MANET. 2014 Fourth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies. 2014;173–7. Available from: doi: 10.1109/CSNT.2014.42

5. Rathi B., Singh E.F. Performance Analysis of Distance Vector and Link State Routing Protocols. Int J Comput Sci Trends Technol. 2015;3(4):23–32.

6. Imran N., Riaz S., Shaheen A., Sharif M., Raza M. Comparative Analysis of Link State and Distance Vector Routing Protocols for Mobile Adhoc Networks. Sci Int. 2014;26(2):669–74.

7. Al-Sultan S., Al-Doori M.M., Al-Bayatti A.H., Zedan H. A comprehensive survey on vehicular ad hoc network. J Netw Comput Appl. 2014;37:380–92. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2013.02.036.

8. Altayeb M., Mahgoub I. A Survey of Vehicular Ad hoc Networks Routing Techniques. Int J Innov Appl Stud. 2013;3(3):829–46.

9. Johnson D.B. Routing in Ad Hoc Networks of Mobile Hosts. 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. 1994;158–63.

10. Patel D., Faisal M., Batavia P., Makhija S., Mani M. Overview of Routing Protocols in VANET. Int J Comput Appl. 2016;136(9):4–7.