Keywords: information map, visualization efficiency, problem-solving speed, problem-solving accuracy, protected cyberspace, cyberspace cartography
Evaluating the effectiveness of information maps of protected cyberspace
UDC 004.056:004.78
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.35.4.023
The relevance of the study stems from the urgency of protecting cyberspace, which is subjected to total information attacks by malicious codes and destructive content. One of the effective means to ensure the security of global and national cyberspace is the mapping of processes occurring in it, including monitoring and counteraction in the conditions of information confrontation, steadily increasing in the state, corporate and social networks. The main purpose of information maps should be seen as increasing the efficiency of experts' (decision-maker's) work based on resolving the contradiction between the need to obtain objective quantitative estimates of the information map influence on the speed and quality of tasks solved using it and the subjective factors affecting the aforementioned characteristics. In this regard, the paper considers for cartographic methods: speed of problem solving, accuracy of problem solving; labor intensity of building an information map; laboriousness of updating the information map; the amount of new knowledge gained through problem solving. This analyzes the effectiveness of the visualization, including the number of intersections and bends of the graph edges, their total length, shape metrics, dynamic stability, cluster and distance change reliability metrics. The effectiveness of the information map is assessed using a search for publications on "Computer Crime" as an example, including a graphical comparison of the results. The conclusion outlines the prospects for further research on the development of methodologies to assess the effectiveness of information maps of protected cyberspace.
1. Behrisch M., Blumenschein M., Kim N.W. Quality metrics for information visualization. Computer Graphics Forum. 2018;37(3):625–662.
2. Meidiana A., Hong S.H., Eades P. New Quality Metrics for Dynamic Graph Drawing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.07764. 2020:1–17.
3. Yoghourdjian V., Archambault D., Diehl S. et al. Exploring the limits of complexity: A survey of empirical studies on graph visualization. Visual Informatics. 2018;2(4):264–282.
4. Borgo R., Lee B., Bach B. Crowdsourcing for information visualization: Promises and pitfalls. Evaluation in the crowd. Crowdsourcing and human-centered experiments. Springer, Cham. 2017:96–138.
5. Garae J, Ko R. K. L., Apperley M. Full-scale security visualization effectiveness measurement and presentation approach. 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE). IEEE. 2018:639–650.
6. Sherman-Morris K., Antonelli K.B., Williams C.C. Measuring the effectiveness of the graphical communication of hurricane storm surge threat. Weather, climate, and society. 2015;7(1):69–82.
7. Krassanakis V., Cybulski P. A review on eye movement analysis in map reading process: The status of the last decade. Geodesy and Cartography. 2019;68(1):191–209.
8. Griffin A.L. Cartography, visual perception and cognitive psychology. The Routledge handbook of mapping and cartography. Routledge. 2017:44–54.
9. Montello D.R., Fabrikant S.I., Davies C. Cognitive perspectives on cartography and other geographic information visualizations. Handbook of behavioral and cognitive geography. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2018:177–196.
10. Gilhooly K.J. et al. Skill in map reading and memory for maps. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. 1988;40(1):87–107.
11. Korporaal M., Ruginski I.T., Fabrikant S.I. Effects of uncertainty visualization on decision making with map-based geographic data under time pressure. Frontiers in Computer Science. 2020;2:32.
12. Stachoň Z. Šašinka Č., Čeněk J. Cross-cultural differences in figure-ground perception of cartographic stimuli. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 2019;46(1):82–94.
13. Stenliden L. Visual Analytics in K12 Education-Emerging Dimensions of Complexity. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering. 2015;9(2):663–671.
14. Serdechnyi A.L., Goncharov A.A., Ostapenko A.G. Technology of construction and use of retraival maps in the educational process on the example of the search map for the academic discipline «Computer Crimes». Intellektual'nyye informatsionnyye sistemy. trudy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii: v 2 ch. Voronezh = Intelligent Information Systems. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 2 p. Voronezh. 2021:94–98. (In Russ.)
Keywords: information map, visualization efficiency, problem-solving speed, problem-solving accuracy, protected cyberspace, cyberspace cartography
For citation: Serdechnyi A.L. Evaluating the effectiveness of information maps of protected cyberspace. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2021;9(4). URL: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1056 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.35.4.023 (In Russ).
Received 24.09.2021
Revised 25.11.2021
Accepted 29.12.2021
Published 31.12.2021