Keywords: hydrophobicity, roughness, geometric characteristics of the surface, fractal dimension, surface microprofile, scale
Investigation of the relationship between the wetting angle and the surface microprofile parameters
UDC 62.408.8
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2025.49.2.039
A brief overview of new approaches to characterizing the quality of surfaces with hydrophobic properties is given. These approaches are based on mathematical procedures involving a large amount of computation, including fractal methods. The relationship between the wetting angle of a hydrophobic surface and surface parameters such as roughness and fractal dimension of the profile has been studied. A model of a superhydrophobic surface is developed, its parameters are described, such as the effective hydrophobic wetting angle, the proportion of the solid phase of the surface in contact with the liquid, and the parameters of the hierarchical structure. It has been established that the use of nanostructured columns in the formation of a superhydrophobic surface, taking into account the hierarchical structure, makes it possible to significantly increase the values of the wetting edge angle. The dependence of the wetting edge angle on the fraction of the liquid-solid contact at the interface is determined, which is explained by the complication of the surface structure, and the relationship between the fraction of the solid phase and the fractal dimension is determined. It was found that when estimating the wetting edge angle, the relationship of the fractal dimension is significantly higher in comparison with the roughness parameters Ra and Rz. The correlation coefficients between the wetting angle and other parameters of the hydrophobic surface were determined using regression analysis. The results obtained can be used in the processing of measurement information in accordance with modern standards in the field of geometric characteristics of surfaces, including in the development of software for measuring parameters of hydrophobic surfaces.
1. Boinovich L.B., Emelyanenko A.M. Hydrophobic Materials and Coatings: Principles of Design, Properties and Applications. Russian Chemical Reviews. 2008;77(7):583–600. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2008v077n07ABEH003775
2. Buznik V.M. Superhydrophobic Materials Based on Fluoroplastics. Aviacionnye Materialy and Tehnologii. 2013;(1):29–34. (In Russ.).
3. Schwartz A., Perry J.W. Surface Active Agents. Their Chemistry and Technology. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo inostrannoi literatury; 1953. 544 p. (In Russ.).
4. Mandelbrot B.В. The Fractal Geometry of Nature. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1982. 460 p.
5. Sethi S.K., Manik G. Recent Progress in Super Hydrophobic/Hydrophilic Self-Cleaning Surfaces for Various Industrial Applications: A Review. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering. 2018;57(18):1932–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602559.2018.1447128
6. Chermahini S.H., Ostad-Ali-Askari K., Eslamian S., Singh V.P. Recent Progress in Self-Cleaning Materials with Different Suitable Applications. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2018;11(2):560–573. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajeassp.2018.560.573
7. Lin Yu., Chen H., Wang G., Liu A. Recent Progress in Preparation and Anti-Icing Applications of Superhydrophobic Coatings. Coatings. 2018;8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8060208
8. Gulyaev I.P., Kuzmin V.I., Kovalev O.B. Highly Hydrophobic Ceramic Coatings Produced by Plasma Spraying of Powder Materials. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics. 2020;27(4):585–594. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869864320040113
9. Lee W.X., Farid A.A., Namazi H. Investigation of Anodised Surface Complexity and Its Correlation with Surface Hydrophilicity Using Fractal Analysis. Results in Surfaces and Interfaces. 2022;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsurfi.2022.100046
10. Wu J., Jin X., Mi Sh., Tang J. An Effective Method to Compute the Box-Counting Dimension Based on the Mathematical Definition and Intervals. Results in Engineering. 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2020.100106
11. Nazhipkyzy M., Mansurov Z. Super Hydrophobic Materials and Coatings: Overview. Combustion and Plasma Chemistry. 2020;18(4):163–189. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18321/cpc393
12. Yao Ch.-W., Tang S., Sebastian D., Tadmor R. Sliding of Water Droplets on Micropillar-Structured Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Applied Surface Science. 2020;504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144493
13. Roy T., Sabharwal T.P., Kumar M., Ranjan P., Balasubramaniam R. Mathematical Modelling of Superhydrophobic Surfaces for Determining the Correlation Between Water Contact Angle and Geometrical Parameters. Precision Engineering. 2020;61:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.10.005
14. Hubert J., Mertens J., Dufour T., et al. Synthesis and Texturization Processes of (Super)-Hydrophobic Fluorinated Surfaces by Atmospheric Plasma. Journal of Materials Research. 2015;30(21):3177–3191. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2015.279
15. Dubov A.L., Teisseire J., Barthel E. Elastic Instability and Contact Angles on Hydrophobic Surfaces with Periodic Textures. Europhysics Letters. 2012;97(2). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/97/26003
16. Reyssat M., Quéré D. Contact Angle Hysteresis Generated by Strong Dilute Defects. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2009;113(12):3906–3909. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp8066876
17. Wang Ch., Shao R., Wang G., Sun Sh. Hierarchical Hydrophobic Surfaces with Controlled Dual Transition Between Rose Petal Effect and Lotus Effect Via Structure Tailoring or Chemical Modification. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2021;622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126661
18. Zimon A.D. Adgeziya zhidkosti i smachivanie. Moscow: Khimiya; 1974. 416 p. (In Russ.).
19. Baxter S., Cassie A.B.D. 8–The Water Repellency of Fabrics and a New Water Repellency Test. Journal of the Textile Institute Transactions. 1945;36(4):T67–T90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19447024508659707
20. Feng L., Li Sh., Li H., et al. Super-Hydrophobic Surface of Aligned Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2002;41(7):1221–1223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1221::aid-anie1221>3.0.co;2-g
21. Grigoriev S.N., Masterenko D.A., Skoptsov E.S. The Analysis of the Measurement Information on Electrical Discharge Machined Steel Surfaces. Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika. 2023;(9):38–45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2023-9-38-45
22. Markov B.N., Masterenko D.A., Emelyanov P.N. Teleshevskiy V.I. Algorithmization for Calculating Fractal Parameters of the Relief of a Rough Surface According to GOST R ISO 25178-2-2014. Measurement Techniques. 2020;63(8):610–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01830-z
23. Johnson N.L., Leone F.C. Statistics and Experimental Design in Enguneerubg and the Physical Sciences. Volume II. Moscow: Mir; 1981. 516 p. (In Russ.).
24. Roach P., Shirtcliffe N.J., Newton M.I. Progess in Superhydrophobic Surface Development. Soft Matter. 2008;4(2):224–240. https://doi.org/10.1039/b712575p
Keywords: hydrophobicity, roughness, geometric characteristics of the surface, fractal dimension, surface microprofile, scale
For citation: Anisimov A.D., Masterenko D.A. Investigation of the relationship between the wetting angle and the surface microprofile parameters. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2025;13(2). URL: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1933 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2025.49.2.039 (In Russ).
Received 29.04.2025
Revised 29.05.2025
Accepted 06.06.2025