MODELING OF COUNTERACTION TO DESTRUCTIVE INFLUENCE IN SOCIAL NETWORKS

the country on the organization of destructive impacts on Russian society and its social groups, especially youth, in order to destabilize the domestic political, socio-economic and criminal situation has significantly increased in social networks. That is why in the Doctrine of information security of the Russian Federation information and psychological effects (IPE) are called important negative factors affecting the state of information security (IS). In this regard, the creation of models to counter destructive information impacts (DII) of manipulative nature in social networks, assessment and forecasting of their impact on social groups are at the present stage actual management tasks. The system-dynamic model of information counteraction of DII in social networks is considered. Its application for the purposes of counteraction to information terrorism, extremism and other destructive influences on modern society by means of information networks is proved. The description of the model in the form of flowcharts in the designations of system dynamics is given. Systems of differential equations are shown. Simulation experiments with models using the promising Anylogic platform were carried out. The model make it possible to forecast DII taking into account the factor of counteraction in social networks, to play different scenarios of the dynamics of these interrelated processes.

1. The Doctrine of information security of the Russian Federation. Approved by the decree of the President of the Russian Federation. No. 646 of December 5, 2016. (In Russ.)

2. Gubanov D. A., Novikov D. A., Chkhartishvili A. G. [Social networks: models of information influence, management and confrontations]. M: Publishing house of physical and mathematical literature, 2010. – 228 p. (In Russ.)

3. Minaev V. A., Ovchinskij A. S., Skryl' S. V., Trostyanskij S. N. [How to manage mass consciousness. Modern models]. M.: Publishing House "Russian New University", 2013. – 200 p. (In Russ.)

4. Minaev V. A., Dvoryankin S. V. [Modeling dynamics of informationalpsychological influences on mass consciousness] // Voprosy kiberbezopasnosti = Cybersecurity issues. 2016. № 5 (18). - Pp. 56-64. (In Russ.)

5. Minaev V. A., Dvoryankin S. V. [Rationale and description of dynamics model of informational-psychological impacts of a destructive nature in social networks] // Security of information technologies. 2016. Vol. 23. No. 3. – Pp. 40-52. 2016. (In Russ.)

6. Minaev V. A., Sychev M. P., Vaitz E. V., Gracheva YU. V. [Modeling of information security threats using the principles of system dynamics // Voprosy radioehlektroniki = Problems of Radio Electronics. 2017. No. 6. - Pp. 75-82. (In Russ.)

7. Cappelli D. M., Desai A. G., Moore A. P., Shimeall T. J., Weaver E. A., Bradford B. J. Management and Education of the Risk of Insider Threat (MERIT): System Dynamics Modeling of Computer System Sabotage. Pittsburg: Carnegie Mellon University. Software Engineering Institute, 2006. – 34 p.

8. Behara R. S., Derrick Huang C. A. System Dynamics Model of Information Security Investments // Journal of Information System Security. 2010. Vol. 6. No. 2. – Pp. 1572-1583.

9. Kim A. C., Lee S. M., Lee D. H. Compliance Risk Assessment Measures of Financial Information Security Using System Dynamics // International Journal of Security and Its Applications. 2012. Vol. 6. No. 4. – Pp. 191-200.

10. Liu W., Cui Y., Li. Y. Information Systems Security Assessment Based on System Dynamics // International Journal of Security and Its Applications. 2015. Vol. 9. No. 2. – Pp. 73-84.

11. Minaev V. A., Sychev M. P., Vaitz E. V., Kirakosyan A. E. [System-dynamics modeling information influences of on society] // Voprosy radioehlektroniki = Problems of Radio Electronics. 2017. No. 11. – Pp. 35-43. (In Russ.)

12. Malikov R. F. [A training manual on simulation of complex systems in AnyLogic]. Ufa: Publishing House of Bashkir State Pedagogical University, 2013. – 296 p. (In Russ.)