Selection of software of computing complexes for processing data of administrative materials of traffic violations

empirical studies have shown a clear dependence of the accident rate in the region on the quality and efficiency of software for processing data of administrative materials of traffic violations. Choosing the optimal software for computing systems for processing administrative materials of traffic violations is an urgent problem nowadays. Fifteen qualitative characteristics of computer software for processing data of administrative materials of traffic violations based on component analysis and their quantitative indicators obtained from experts in the field of road safety management are proposed to investigate in this work. The component analysis of the subject of the study is given, the results of analysis of three groups of qualitative characteristics that allow to select software both on the basis of a certain group of characteristics and on the basis of a complex quality indicator are presented. The further development of the ideas set out in this article will be the development of an application package for the optimal choice of software for computer systems for processing data of administrative materials of traffic violations.

1. Konobeevskikh V. V., Pitolin M. V. Quality assessment of software of computing complexes based on expert data. Modeling, optimization and information technology. 2020;8(4). Available from: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=874 (In Russ) DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2020.31.4.028. (accessed 10.03.2021).

2. Konobeevskikh V. V., Pitolin M. V. Quality assessment of software of computing complexes based on expert data. Modeling, optimization and information technology. 2020;8(4). Available from: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=875 (In Russ) DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2020.31.4.029 (accessed 10.03.2021).

3. Bukharin S. V., Subiaco E. S., Konobeevskikh V. V. Expert systems for evaluating the quality and price of goods (works, services): a monograph. Voronezh: Voronezh Institute of management marketing and finance. 2006.

4. Azhmuhamedov I.M., Knyazeva O.M. A comprehensive criterion for assessing the quality of information systems. Actual problems of the humanities and natural sciences. 2017:4-6:14-17.

5. Beshelev S. D., Gurvich F. G. Mathematical and statistical methods of expert assessments. Moscow: Statistics. 1980.

6. Bukharin, S. V., Konobeevskikh V. V. Statistical methods of evaluation of quality of radio engineering systems. Safety, security and communications – 2005. Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference. (Voronezh, November 24-25, 2005). 2005:37-39.

7. Litvak B.G. Expert information. Methods of obtaining and analysis. Moscow: Radio and communications. 1982.

8. Kendall M. J. Rank correlations. Moscow: Statistics. 1975.

9. Atanov G., Pustynnikova I. Learning by constructing knowledge bases for expert systems. Proc. International Conf. on Computers in Education. 1999:555-558.

10. Bukharin, S. V., Konobeevskikh V. V. А Combined method of identifying knowledge experts. The bulletin of Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2005;2:22-25.