Анализ влияния качества управления проектом на состояние функциональной безопасности аппаратно-программных комплексов на основе системного архетипа «предел роста»
Работая с нашим сайтом, вы даете свое согласие на использование файлов cookie. Это необходимо для нормального функционирования сайта, показа целевой рекламы и анализа трафика. Статистика использования сайта отправляется в «Яндекс» и «Google»
Научный журнал Моделирование, оптимизация и информационные технологииThe scientific journal Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology
Online media
issn 2310-6018

Analysis of the impact of the project management quality on the state of functional safety of hardware and software systems based on the system archetype “limits to success”

Gvozdev V.E.   Guzairov M.B.   idBezhaeva O.Y.

UDC УДК 004.053
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.34.3.026

  • Abstract
  • List of references
  • About authors

The scientific idea of this work is the formalization of the known thesis that there is a direct relationship between the quality of project management and consumer properties of the resulting product. Hardware and software complexes are a kind of complex systems, which proves the possibility of scientific adaptation of well-known approaches used in the research of complex systems of a different nature to the field of ensuring the functional safety of the hardware and software systems. One sign of this "relationship" of software and hardware systems with complex systems of different nature are typical problem situations arising in the implementation of projects. In the publications, at the declarative level, typical problem situations that occurs in managing of complex systems of different nature are described, and are called system archetypes. In this paper, on the example of the system archetype “limits of success’, a formal approach to the analysis of the compliance of the quality of hardware and software complex project management a with the state of the control object is proposed.The paper proposes a new systemic combination of models and approaches known in system analysis, which made it possible to increase the degree of formalization of research focused on assessing the impact of project management quality on the functional safety of hardware and software systems.

1. Lipaev V.V. Functional safety of software. M.: Sinteg. 2004:348. (In Russ)

2. Lipaev V.V. Reliability and functional safety of real-time software complexes. M.: Institute for System Programming RAS; 2013:207. (In Russ)

3. GOST R МEК 61508-3 – 2012. Functional safety of electrical, electronic, programmable electronic safety-related systems. Software requirements.

4. ESA PSS 05-11. Guide to software quality assurance.

5. Senge P.M. Fifth discipline. M.: Olimp-Business. 2003:408. (In Russ)

6. Meadows D.H. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing. 2008:240.

7. Raikov A.N. Convergent management and decision support. M.: Publishing house IKAR. 2009:244. (In Russ)

8. Reason J., Hollnagel E., Paries J. Revisiting the «Swiss Cheese» Model of Accidents, European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation. 2006;13(06):25.

9. Avramchuk E.F., Vavilov A.A. Technology of system modeling. M.: Mashinostroenie. 1988:520. (In Russ)

10. Milosevic D.Z. A set of tools for project management. M: DMK-Pres. 2008:736. (In Russ)

11. DeMarco T. The human factor: successful projects and teams. Publishing house: Symbol-Plus. 2014:288.

12. Gvozdev V.E., Guzairov M.B., Ilyasov B.G., Kolodenkova A.E. Statistical research of territorial systems. M: Mashinostroenie. 2008:187. (In Russ)

13. Pelaez C.E, Bowles J.B. Using fuzzy cognitive maps as a system model for failure modes and effects analysis. Information Sciences. 1996;88(1):177-199.

14. Gvozdev V.E., Bezhaeva O.Ya., Blinova D.V., Akhmetova D.R. The Model of the Innovative Project as the Multivariable Control Object. Advances in Intelligent Systems Research. 2020;174:278-282.

15. Gvozdev V.E., Bezhaeva O.Ya., Akhmetova D.R., Safinova G.R. Formation of project management model parameters based on linearization of functional dependencies. Design Ontology. 2020;10(4):527-539. (In Russ)

16. Gvozdev V.E., Munasipov R.A., Bezhaeva O.Ya., Akhmetova D. Construction of a model of a multivariable object based on sharing of measured data and expert estimates. Design Ontology, 2019;9(3):361-368. (In Russ)

17. Pugachev V.S. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. M.: Fizmallit. 2002:496. (In Russ)

18. Gaskarov D.V., Golinkevich T.A., Mozgalevsky A.V. Forecasting the technical condition and reliability of electronic equipment. M.: Sovetskoe radio. 1974:223. (In Russ)

Gvozdev Vladimir Efimovich
doctor of science professor
Email: wega55@mail.ru

Scopus | eLibrary |

Ufa State Aviation Technical Univercity

Ufa, Russia

Guzairov Murat Bakeevich
doctor of science professor
Email: mbguzairov@gmail.com

eLibrary |

Ufa State Aviation Technical Univercity

Ufa, Russia

Bezhaeva Oxana Yakovlevna
PhD assistant professor
Email: obezhaeva@gmail.com

Scopus | ORCID | eLibrary |

Ufa State Aviation Technical Univercity

Ufa, Russia

Keywords: project management, problem situation, functional safety, hardware-software system, system archetype “limits to success”

For citation: Gvozdev V.E. Guzairov M.B. Bezhaeva O.Y. Analysis of the impact of the project management quality on the state of functional safety of hardware and software systems based on the system archetype “limits to success”. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2021;9(3). Available from: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1029 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.34.3.026 (In Russ).


Full text in PDF

Received 02.08.2021

Revised 20.09.2021

Accepted 23.09.2021

Published 18.10.2021