Keywords: volumetric petrophysical model, geostatistics, kriging, seismic exploration, geological well logging, seismic attribute, optimization
Optimized double kriging algorithm for the geological environment parameters modeling
UDC 550.8.053:519.2
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.35.4.018
The geological environment parameters are widely used in the hydrocarbon deposits exploration and study. They store information about the rocks physical characteristics, the location of the reservoirs, the boundaries of the layers separation, etc. The numerical values of the parameters under consideration are obtained by conducting geophysical well logging (GWL), or by recalculating existing logging curves based on known petrophysical laws. Because GWL can be carried out only if there is a drilled well, the environment parameters are often known only in a small near-wellbore space. This makes urgent the task of predicting the geological environment parameters within the entire field. The existing methods for solving this task can be conditionally divided into two groups: using only GWL data; complexly using 3D seismic and GWL data. The first group is effective when there is a dense grid of downhole measurements. The second group shows the best results in the conditions of a sparse irregular grid, however, it requires the seismic data availability within the entire studied field. This paper describes a new method for predicting geological environment parameters based on the GWL data and 3D seismic prospecting combined use. The paper also provides an algorithmic implementation of the new method; ways of optimizing algorithmic implementation are considered.
1. Voskresenskij Yu.N. Polevaya geofizika [Field geophysics]. M.: Nedra; 2010.
2. Dem'yanov V.V., Savel'eva E.A. Geostatistika: teoriya i praktika [Geostatistics: theory and practice]. M.: Science; 2010.
3. Matheron G. Traité de géostatistique appliquée. Paris – France: Editions BGRM; 1962.
4. Kovalevskij E.V. Geologicheskoe modelirovanie na osnove geostatistiki. EAGE Publishing; 2011.
5. Ermakov A.P. Vvedenie v sejsmorazvedku. Tver: GERS Publishing House; 2012.
6. Shestakov V.V., Gerget O.M. Double kriging method adaptation to the geological environment structural factors. Nauchnyy vestnik novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. 2020;1(78):119-134.
7. Kostyuchenko E., Kostyuchenko E., Meshcheryakov R., Ignatieva D., Pyatkov A., Choynzonov E., Balatskaya L. Correlation Normalization of Syllables and Comparative Evaluation of Pronunciation Quality in Speech Rehabilitation. Lecture notes in computer science. 2017. 10458 LNAI: 262-271.
8. Koskov V.N., Koskov B.V. Well logging and GWL data interpretation. Permian: Perm State tech. university. 2007.
9. Bendat J., Piersol A. Analysis and Measurement Procedures. M.: World; 1989.
10. Tyrtyshnikov E.E. Matrix Analysis and Linear Algebra. M.: Fizmatlit Publishing House; 2007.
Keywords: volumetric petrophysical model, geostatistics, kriging, seismic exploration, geological well logging, seismic attribute, optimization
For citation: Shestakov V.V., Gerget O.M. Optimized double kriging algorithm for the geological environment parameters modeling. Modeling, Optimization and Information Technology. 2021;9(4). URL: https://moitvivt.ru/ru/journal/pdf?id=1045 DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2021.35.4.018 (In Russ).
Received 01.09.2021
Revised 16.10.2021
Accepted 08.12.2021
Published 31.12.2021